See and read it all here and now.

Animation on the UPGRADE01A YouTube channel. Read other information here.

Science fiction and politics is covered mostly at this space-time, but every category listed is mentioned in a blog, story or commentary here.

The free exchange of ideas, hopes, dreams, goods, services, peace and love should prevail. Education is alive and free online and in the world’s libraries.



In my view M-theory will continue to develop until it becomes a proper theory. It will likely, eventually incorporate equivalent mathematical models that may or may not “look” like strings and branes

The essential thing to understand about Hawking’s stance on God, is in the equations and the philosophy of the scientific method.  God will never be added into any of the equations. 

 There are entities in the Universe, and every entity has attributes associated with it, otherwise it would not be something new. How would a “God of Abraham” factor ever fit into such a system?  What about just a Creator entity? No, because that is just jumping to a goal post, without knowing how you got there. It could turn out that we live inside of a simulation with a sort of creator.  I tested this theory, and the simulator did not respond.   I think we have a long way to go before we can determine whether or not we live inside of a simulation though, so I think we should stick to science.

It would seem that the universe bubble that we exist in, is but one of an infinite number of possible bubbles, all existing under the same laws, but exerting different values for their particle/strings to “settle” within a given set of fields.

There are hills and valleys upon where each of the fundamental particles can land to rest or actually vibrate.

It may turn out that waves push the particles around, and that an equivalent model, or a more accurate model could be built up from that.

Penrose has a “twister” model that may prove more accurate. There are many other theories. 

The “why” questions tend to get almost answered by a never-ending series of how questions. The Godists seem to insist that we solve everything at once, and reach a false goal line that was invented by man.

Mathematics in conjunction with science works. It may not ease your soul, but it does fine by me. The universe is a great and wondrous place. Reading about it from authors such as Hawking, Pinker, Dawkins, Greene, V. Stenger, and many others, gives me great joy. Many doors have been opened for me by these great writers.

Home More Links More Posts

Note:  Some links are broken now.  Am in the process of fixing some and deleting others…

Hitchhiker’s Guide To the Galaxy. God non existence of.

Douglas Adams : Radical Atheist

I encourage others to post their own links which contain a different point of view. Do you believe in The Golden Rule? I do. Perhaps you have a different world view that you would care to share…

Creation Science


The following educational videos are intended for believers in the God of Abraham (targeted mostly toward Christians), please watch at least a few of these very short videos with your intelligent, rational open mind…

… Perhaps you feel the above videos miss the point? Perhaps they do. On the other hand, consider this: You may be missing the point and the intention for the so-called “other side.” Do you believe in Love and the joy of music? I do. Did you know that many atheists have a very positive, optimistic viewpoint on life? Many of us see and enjoy the music of Bach, and appreciate the the literature and lessons in the bible. One cannot appreciate the goodness (and evil) behind Western Civilization without reading and understanding the bible.

I doubt that Bach was thinking about stoning people to death as a punishment for violating on of God’s commandments when he wrote “The Passion.”

Perhaps you underestimate the power and beauty of mathematics, the awe that scientists feel when they view the Universe through their eyes. Maybe, just maybe you misjudge the feelings and world view of others.

Maybe there is more to the scientific method than meets the eye…

Perhaps we should learn to get along and tolerate different world views, but does that mean the we should tolerate a world view that advocates random killing and death of innocents? Does one evil deed on one side require another evil deed on the other? Are you sure you understand your own position of what you are advocating? How do you know you are right?

Consider this: No matter what you believe, most people think you are wrong. Surely there is not a single person on the planet who is absolutely right about everything. Maybe your world view has some flaws in it, and maybe you misinterpret what other people or teachings are saying.

Learn more …

Richard Dawkins:Lecture1. Waking up in the universe (1 of 7)

  • The Brights – “A bright is a person who has a naturalistic worldview …”

… Here is a different take on religion, with a different point-of-view that a friend sent me:
Vexon Crabtree on Single God Religions

More videos….

  • Stephen Hawking interviewed on “Yair Lapid” Answers “God question” at the end.
  • Atheism: A Rough History Of Disbelief ep.1 prt.1 This is a very nice documentary.

… See the rest of A Rough History simply by scrolling through YouTube….

Home Links Posts